Search found 13 matches

by manolito
Sat Aug 31, 2019 5:56 pm
Forum: User Announcements
Topic: Windows XP compatible non-SSE2 FFmpeg builds
Replies: 12
Views: 6166

Re: Windows XP compatible non-SSE2 FFmpeg builds

I totally agree with you. For most of the libraries you mention I have no idea what they are for. So I am all for some kind of cleanup effort. Thanks again for still taking care of us retro WinXP users... Cheers manolito //EDIT// Took the new builds to my test bench. Both the static and the shared b...
by manolito
Sun Apr 28, 2019 1:10 pm
Forum: User Announcements
Topic: Windows XP compatible non-SSE2 FFmpeg builds
Replies: 12
Views: 6166

Re: Windows XP compatible non-SSE2 FFmpeg builds

Thanks very much to CoRoNe for keeping up providung us XP users with current FFmpeg builds... :D

Both the static and the shared builds passed all my tests without any hiccups.

Thanks again
manolito
by manolito
Mon Apr 15, 2019 8:55 pm
Forum: Offical Announcements
Topic: Windows XP Support And Intel QSV
Replies: 25
Views: 28959

Re: Windows XP Support And Intel QSV

This topic from the post: https://ffmpeg.zeranoe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=2937#p10037 https://ffmpeg.zeranoe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=10000#p10000 seems to have disappeared from this forum. Any specific reason? This thread was mostly about the CoRoNe XP-Compatible FFmpeg builds. Is anyone here...
by manolito
Sat May 27, 2017 12:46 am
Forum: Offical Announcements
Topic: Windows XP Support And Intel QSV
Replies: 25
Views: 28959

Re: Windows XP Support And Intel QSV

This promise to make XP compatible builds from time to time was made in March 2016. I think you better forget about it... The latest XP compatible shared build can be made by patching rogerdpack's build 3.12 from August 2016. I have uploaded it for you here: http://www13.zippyshare.com/v/rDL8OWwZ/fi...
by manolito
Mon Jan 02, 2017 4:02 pm
Forum: User Announcements
Topic: WinLoud released. Loudness normalize with Loudnorm.
Replies: 26
Views: 14328

Re: WinLoud released. Loudness normalize with Loudnorm.

Regarding the last paragraph of the previous post I do see things a little differently... ;) First of all AutoIt had an official decompiler which worked for scripts compiled with AutoIt v3.2.5.1 and earlier. Only after this version they changed their mind. From one of your previous posts: I would gl...
by manolito
Sun Jan 01, 2017 11:16 pm
Forum: User Announcements
Topic: WinLoud released. Loudness normalize with Loudnorm.
Replies: 26
Views: 14328

Re: WinLoud released. Loudness normalize with Loudnorm.

Thanks, I already do have fun with it... First of all I discovered that the slow speed issue is not completely fixed. When I force 2-pass through the command line only the first pass is fast. For the second pass WinLoudCLI again consumes more than 40% of my CPU cycles. And I have another problem whe...
by manolito
Sun Jan 01, 2017 2:31 pm
Forum: User Announcements
Topic: WinLoud released. Loudness normalize with Loudnorm.
Replies: 26
Views: 14328

Re: WinLoud released. Loudness normalize with Loudnorm.

Thanks for the new version, looks good... If the Samp. Freq. is not specified, it output a 192 kHz file Yes, the blog post of the LoudNorm author explains that for accurate TruePeak detection the audio is upsampled to 192kHz. Of course it makes sense to use an upsampled file for the analysis, but fo...
by manolito
Sat Dec 31, 2016 7:13 pm
Forum: User Announcements
Topic: WinLoud released. Loudness normalize with Loudnorm.
Replies: 26
Views: 14328

Re: WinLoud released. Loudness normalize with Loudnorm.

Yes, the test release fixes it, thanks a lot. It is just a tad slower than with the script paused, but this is probably due to the FFmpeg progress calculation. (Would you care to explain the bug?) I just found another small bug: For the sample frequency this is what the CLI help says: -FREQ <freq> S...
by manolito
Sat Dec 31, 2016 3:50 pm
Forum: User Announcements
Topic: WinLoud released. Loudness normalize with Loudnorm.
Replies: 26
Views: 14328

Re: WinLoud released. Loudness normalize with Loudnorm.

@ Muxson Just did a few tests to determine if WinLoudCLI really is to blame for the slow speed, and yes it is... I used a WAV file with a length of 8min, used the 1-pass mode to convert it to LUFS -18, Range 11 and TP -1.5. Results: WinLoud GUI: 15min 30sec GUI but pausing the WinLoudCLI from the ta...
'